Ubiquiti G6 180 vs Reolink Argus 4 Pro vs Hikvision DS-2CD2T87G2P-LSU/SL Dual Lens Panoramic Surveilance Cameras

Ubiquiti recently announced its first dual-lens camera, the G6 180.

I am a big fan of dual lens cameras and have used most of the options from Reolink, including the Duo, Duo Floodlight and the Duo 3.

When I saw the G6 180, it looked suspiciously familiar to the Reolink Argus 4 Pro. The Argus 4 Pro is a battery-powered WiFi camera, so very different. But, Reolink are due to launch a POE version anytime soon.

With a growing number of brands introducing cameras with true colour night footage, I have often wondered if they are using sensors and technology that Hikvision pioneered.

To the best of my knowledge, Hikvision were the first company to do true colour night footage and the first, or one of the first, companies to offer a dual lens 180°.

They have numerous sub-brands where these technologies have been trickled down to.

I suspected that many brands are using white label hardware from a larger company.

The Ubiquiti G6 180 appeared so similar to the Argus 4 Pro, I was convinced they were manufactured by the same company. So, I did my best to compare the Ubiquiti G6 180 with the Reolink Argus 4 Pro and the dual lens Hikvision DS-2CD2T87G2P-LSU/SL.

While there are some suspiciously similar specs, it wasn’t quite like-for-like as I expected.

The end result is that I am not too sure. It is possible, if not likely, that when Reolink launch their POE dual lens camera, it will have specs much closer to the Ubiquiti, but we will have to wait and see how that plays out.

One likely possibility is that these sensors are manufactured by OmniVision. This is something that has been speculated about Hikvision for quite some time.

Ubiquiti G6 180 vs Reolink Argus 4 Pro vs Hikvision DS-2CD2T87G2P-LSU/SL Specification

Analysis of Similarities and Hardware

Looking at the specifications, there are several points of convergence and divergence among the Reolink Argus 4 Pro, Hikvision DS-2CD2T87G2P, and Ubiquiti G6 180 cameras. Here’s a breakdown of their similarities and differences to assess if they might share underlying hardware:

• Image Sensor: All three cameras use a 1/1.8″ sensor size, though described differently (single CMOS for Reolink, dual Progressive Scan CMOS for Hikvision, and dual 8MP for Ubiquiti). This suggests a potential similarity in sensor technology or supplier, as 1/1.8″ is a specific size often sourced from common manufacturers like Sony or OmniVision in the surveillance industry. However, the dual-sensor configuration in Hikvision and Ubiquiti versus Reolink’s single sensor indicates different implementations.
• Resolution and Field of View: Reolink and Hikvision share the same resolution of 5120 × 1440, while Ubiquiti offers a higher 7680 x 2160 (16MP). All three provide a 180° horizontal field of view, which is likely achieved through dual-lens or wide-angle configurations. This points to a similar design goal of panoramic coverage, possibly using comparable lens or stitching technology, though Ubiquiti’s higher resolution suggests a more advanced processing capability.
• Night Vision: Reolink and Hikvision both support colour night vision (Reolink via spotlights, Hikvision via low-light sensitivity and white light), while Ubiquiti relies on infrared with no mention of colour capability. This divergence suggests different hardware or firmware approaches to low-light performance, reducing the likelihood of shared night vision components.
• Power and Connectivity: Reolink stands out as a battery-powered, wireless camera with Wi-Fi support, while Hikvision and Ubiquiti use PoE (Power over Ethernet), indicating wired setups. This fundamental difference in power delivery and connectivity implies distinct internal architectures and target use cases, making shared hardware less likely at the power management level.
• Physical Design: The cameras vary significantly in dimensions and weight, with Reolink being the smallest and lightest (128 × 87 × 80 mm, 400 g), Hikvision the largest and heaviest (118.6 × 105.1 × 305.4 mm, 1420 g), and Ubiquiti in between (136 x 64 x 92 mm, 839 g). These differences suggest unique enclosures and mounting designs, likely tailored to their specific power and connectivity needs, further reducing the chance of shared hardware beyond core components.
• Smart Detection: All three offer advanced detection features (person, vehicle, animal), though described differently. This could indicate similar software algorithms or AI processing chips, but it’s not conclusive evidence of shared hardware, as such features can be implemented via firmware on different platforms.

Conclusion on Hardware Similarity: While there are notable similarities in image sensor size, resolution (between Reolink and Hikvision), and field of view, the differences in power methods, night vision technology, physical design, and connectivity suggest that these cameras are unlikely to share the same underlying hardware beyond possibly sourcing similar sensor components from common suppliers. The Reolink Argus 4 Pro’s battery-powered, wireless nature sets it apart from the PoE-based, wired designs of Hikvision and Ubiquiti, pointing to distinct internal architectures. Hikvision and Ubiquiti show more alignment in using dual sensors and PoE, but differences in resolution and night vision capabilities indicate they are still separate designs. These cameras likely target overlapping markets with panoramic surveillance needs but achieve this through customised hardware and firmware solutions.

Ubiquiti G6 180 Specification

Reolink Argus 4 Pro Specification

Hikvision DS-2CD2T87G2P-LSU/SL Specification

• Author
• Recent Posts

Paul MacMillan

Editor at Your Networking Universe

Paul McMillon is the editor-in-chief ofYour Networking Universe that delves deep into the world of computer networking hardware. When it comes to WiFi routers, Mesh WiFi systems, switches, servers, and network-attached storage, Paul is your go-to expert.

Educational Background
Armed with a BSc in Computer Science, Paul combines theoretical knowledge with hands-on expertise. His academic background serves as a robust foundation, enabling him to dissect complex networking topics and present them in a way that's both insightful and easy to grasp.

Professional Journey
Over the years, Paul has cultivated a platform that's not just about reviews or news; it's a comprehensive guide for anyone looking to navigate the intricate maze of computer networking. Whether you're a seasoned IT professional or a curious beginner, you'll find a wealth of information here, meticulously researched and objectively presented.

Personal Interests
But hey, it's not all wires and signals for Paul. When he's not buried in specs sheets or testing the latest networking gear, you'll likely find him globetrotting, exploring new cultures and landscapes. A fitness enthusiast at heart, Paul enjoys a good run or a cycling session to clear his mind. He believes that a healthy body fuels a healthy mind, which in turn, contributes to better quality work.

Why Follow Paul?
So, why should you pay attention to what Paul has to say? Well, it's simple. His reviews and articles are grounded in objective data, ensuring that you get an unbiased perspective. Plus, his knack for breaking down complicated subjects into digestible pieces makes even the most daunting of networking tasks seem achievable.

In a world where technology is ever-evolving, having a reliable source to guide you through the complexities of computer networking is invaluable. And that's precisely what Paul McMillon brings to the table.

Latest posts by Paul MacMillan (see all)

• Ubiquiti G6 180 vs Reolink Argus 4 Pro vs Hikvision DS-2CD2T87G2P-LSU/SL Dual Lens Panoramic Surveilance Cameras - June 26, 2025
• Essential Windows Run Commands for IT Support / MSP - June 16, 2025
• Hetzner AS162 vs EX130 Dedicated Server – AMD EPYC 9454P vs Intel Xeon Gold 5412U - June 2, 2025